Türk Siyaseti ve Türkiye Siyasi Tarihi - Video Projesi - Türk ve İslam Tarihi - Türk Dna'sı

Trilateral Komisyonu Nedir?

Birinci Dünya Savaşının galibi İngiltere'dir. İngiliz devletini yöneten unsur kraliyet hanedanlığıdır. Bilindiği gibi İngilizler, Almanlar, Hollandalılar ve Fransızlar gibi Cermen milletinin bir mensubudurlar.
Birinci Dünya Savaşından sonra Dünyayı yöneten unsurun Birinci Dünya Savaşının galibi ve baş aktörü olan ülkenin olduğunu anlamamız gerekir.
İşte bu İngiltere devleti, kendisinin bir uzantısı olan Amerikan devleti ve Almanya devletindeki bazı aile şirketlerini, şeytani tarikatları ve hükümet nezdindeki önemli kişileri kullanarak(ve ayrıca onları büyütüp, ünlü yapıp, sahneye çıkartıp ve sonrasındada besleyip), Devlet+Mafya-Tarikat-Gladyo sistemini İkinci Dünya Savaşı öncesinde ve sırasında kurmaya çalışmak istemiştir ve başarılı olmuştur.
Nasıl başarılı olmuştur ve bu Devlet+Mafya-Tarikat-Gladyo sisteminin içinde kimler var?
Devlet: İngiltere-Amerika.
Devleti Yöneten Hanedan(İngiliz/Cermen Milletine Hizmet Ediyor): Windsor(İngiliz Cermen Kökenli) ve Rothschild(Hazar Türk Kökenli) sülalelerinin karışımı
Mafya: Rockefeller-Rothschild-JP Morgan gibi sülale şirketleri
Tarikat: İlluminati, Mason, Bilderberg gibi şeytani tarikatlar
Gladyo: İngilizlerin kontrolünde olan Faşist İktidarlar: İngiliz Ajanı Kukla Hitler ve Kukla Nazi Devleti/Hükümeti, ve İngiliz Ajanı Kukla Stalin ve Lenin'in Sovyetler Birliği'nin Yıkımını Amaçlayan Yeni Sovyet Devleti/Hükümeti.
Bu konu hakkında ayrıntılı bilgileri bu forumdaki başlıklarda bulabilirsiniz.

Trilateral Komisyonu Nedir?

Mesajgönderen TurkmenCopur » 05 May 2011, 20:31


The Trilateral Commission was founded in 1973 by New York banker David Rockefeller, then Chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank, and Harvard University academic Zbignieuw Brzezinski, later to become National Security Assistant to President Jimmy Carter.

What it is depends on one's viewpoint. According to the Trilateral Commission itself:

The Trilateral Commission was formed in 1973 by private citizens of Western Europe, Japan and North America to foster closer cooperation among these three regions on common problems. It seeks to improve public understanding of such problems, to support proposals for handling them jointly, and to nurture habits and practices of working together among these regions.

However, in populist political circles the Trilateral Commission is a transparent device to achieve New World Order, which sound suspiciously like other dictatorial "World Orders." From this viewpoint Trilaterals are enemies of freedom and intent on gaining a monopoly of world political power for their own benefit.

Twenty years ago the Trilateral Commission had very little history; one could not track its intentions from its actions.

Today, in 1994, one can look at 20 years of Trilateral history and more accurately assess their objectives in the light of past political actions and member appointments to various Administrations.

The original 1972 membership chosen by Rockefeller and Brzezinski comprised about 200 members worldwide of whom about one-third were North Americans, one-third Europeans and one-third Japanese. In 1993 this had expanded to about 325 members worldwide, termed "distinguished citizens" by the Trilateral Commission but in fact representing an extremely narrow spectrum of world opinion and culture and completely unelected or representative of anything but David Rockefeller's personal views.

From the start the Commission has been termed "private" and "unofficial" with the stated objective to "draw together the highest level unofficial group possible to look together at the common problems facing our three areas" and to "foster cooperation."

Throughout Trilateral Commission's reporting one finds a consistent confusion between "private" and "public." The Commission is promoted as a private group founded by a private citizen. David Rockefeller. Yet its objectives and operations are public policy oriented.

In the words of the Trilateral Commission:

The full Commission gathers once each year—in Lisbon in 1992, in Washington in 1993, in Tokyo in 1994. In addition to special topical sessions and reviews of current developments in our regions, a substantial portion of each annual meeting is devoted to consideration of draft reports to the Commission. These reports are generally the joint product of authors from each of the three regions who draw on a range of consultants in the course of their work. Publication follows discussion in the Commission's annual meeting. The authors are solely responsible for their final text. A separate publication contains the principal presentations at the annual meeting. Occasionally informal papers appear from regional activities.

Each regional group has a Chairman and Deputy Chairman, who all together constitute the leadership of the Commission. The Executive Committee draws together a further 36 individuals from the wider membership.

In brief, this group of private citizens is precisely organized in a manner that ensures its collective views have significant impact on public policy. They meet, they review, they discuss, they report and after this discussion make their recommendations public.

For what purpose? The Trilateral Commission would hardly expend all this energy and funding for an academic exercise. . the objective has to be to establish public policy objectives to be implemented by governments worldwide.

Further, the members are not elected. . they are chosen. The Chairman of the Executive Committee, the committee that chooses members, is David Rockefeller, who is also founder and Chairman of the overall Trilateral Commission. The entire structure reflects Rockefeller choices, not impartial or representative choices.

This phenomenon of a David Rockefeller front organization has not been lost on observers. On July 27,1979, radio station KLMG, Council Bluffs, Iowa, ran an interview of George Franklin, then Coordinator of the Trilateral Commission. This author was a guest on the program. Here from the transcript is how Franklin answered the question of Rockefeller influence.

COMMENTATOR: Why is it, in the Trilateral Commission that the name David Rockefeller shows up so persistently, or [the name of] one of his organizations?

FRANKLIN: Well, this is very reasonable. David Rockefeller is the Chairman of the North American group.

There are three chairmen:

one is [with] the North American group, one is [with] the Japanese group, and one is [with] the European group. Also, the Commission was really David Rockefeller's original idea.

Franklin is aware of the Rockefeller criticism and tries to pass it off as unimportant, as "reasonable." The fact that Rockefeller is personally involved with member selection suggests that the Commission was formed to advance family or personal objectives. If not, then Rockefeller would have allowed others to make such choices.

The commentator then switches the discussion to the then current Carter Administration, in which co-founder Zbignieuw Brzezinski is National Security adviser to Carter and numerous other Trilaterals had been appointed.

COMMENTATOR: On President Carter's staff, how many Trilateral Commission members do you have?

FRANKLIN: Eighteen.

COMMENTATOR: Don't you think that is rather heavy? FRANKLIN: It is quite a lot, yes.

COMMENTATOR: Don't you think it is rather unusual? How many members are there actually in the Trilateral Commission?

FRANKLIN: We have 77 in the United States? COMMENTATOR: Don't you think it is rather unusual to have 18 members on the Carter staff?

FRANKLIN: Yes, I think we chose some very able people when we started the Commission. The President happens to think well of quite a number of them.

This author then pursued with Franklin the question of membership choice and Rockefeller influence. Franklin denies the obvious. It is obvious to any reasonable person that the Trilateral Commission is a Rockefeller organization formed to advance his interest and that it most certainly has significant influence. Influence is the raison d'etre for the Trilateral Commission.

SUTTON: DO you believe that the only able people in the United States are Trilateralists?

FRANKLIN: Of course not.

FRANKLIN: Well, when we started to choose members, we did try to pick out the ablest people we could and I think many of those that are in the Carter Administration would have been chosen by any group that was interested in the foreign policy question.

SUTTON: Would you say that you have an undue influence on policy in the United States?

FRANKLIN: I would not, no.

SUTTON: I think any reasonable man would say that if you have 18 Trilateralists out of 77 in the Carter Administration you have a preponderant influence.

FRANKLIN: These men are not responsive to anything that the Trilateral Commission might advocate. We do have about two reports we put out each year and we do hope they have some influence or we would not put them out.

SUTTON: May I ask another question?


SUTTON: Who financed the Trilateral Commission originally?

FRANKLIN: Uhh. . . The first supporter of all was a foundation called the Kettering Foundation. I can tell you who is financing it at the present time, which might be of more interest to you.

SUTTON: IS it not the Rockefeller Brothers' Fund?

FRANKLIN: The Rockefeller Brothers' Fund? The North American end of the Commission needs $1.5 million over the next three years. Of this amount, $180,000 will be contributed by the Rockefeller Brothers' Fund and $150,000 by David Rockefeller.

COMMENTATOR: Does that mean that most of it is being financed by the Rockefellers?

FRANKLIN: NO, it means that about one-fifth of the North American end is being financed by the Rockefellers and none of the European and Japanese end

Moreover, the Rockefeller family had long-standing interests in several public policy organizations of highly significant influence. The Trilateral Commission only extended the work and influence of the Council on Foreign Relations chaired for many years by the self-same David Rockefeller.

Another Rockefeller family-sponsored and financed group was the Commission on Critical Choices whose task was to identify the "critical choices" facing the United States at the turn of the 21st Century. Once again we have a commission appointed by the Rockefellers, to decide what is best for all Americans.
THE COMMISSION ON CRITICAL CHOICES FOR AMERICANS is a nationally representative, bipartisan group of 42 prominent Americans, brought together under the chairmanship of Nelson A. Rockefeller.

Their assignment:

To identify the critical choices which will confront America as it embarks on its third century as a nation and to determine the realistic and desirable objectives this nation can achieve by 1895 and the year 2000.
The Commission was established in the American tradition of voluntary effort. It is 42 citizens who have joined together to help determine the facts about the future of America.

Because of the complexity and interdependence of issues facing the world today, the Commission organized its work into six study panels, which emphasize the interrelationships of the critical choices rather than studying each one separately.

The six study panels are:

Panel I — Energy and Its Relationship to Ecology, Economics and World Stability;
Panel II — Food, Health, World Population and Quality of Life;
Panel III — Raw Materials, Industrial Development, Capital Formation, Employment and World Trade.
Panel IV — International Trade and Monetary Systems, Inflation and the Relationships Among Differing Economic Systems;
Panel V — Change, National Security and Peace, and
Panel VI — Quality of Life of Individuals and Communities in the U.S.A.

In brief, the Commission is a Rockefeller study group, funded in large part by a Rockefeller organization.
The Third Century Corporation, a New York not-for-profit organization, was created to finance the work of the Commission. Since the start of its activities in the fall of 1973, the Corporation has received contributions and pledges from individuals and from foundations well-known for their support of public interest activities.

The Drive for New World Order

While publically portrayed as a high level discussion group, the Trilateral Commission is dedicated to New World Order. The most comprehensive statement of New World Order is to be found in Trilateral co-founder Brzezinski's book, Between Two Ages: America's Role in the Technetronic Era, published just before the Trilateral Commission was founded.

This book is the blueprint for a "more just and equitable world order." In one sense it is not much different to scores of other plans for political control that go back to Greek times and include More's Utopia, Karl Marx, V.I. Lenin, Adolf Hitler, Mao... all are schemas for political control.
The only document in history that has rigidly defined and restrained government control is the Constitution of the United States, unique because it limits government power. Brzezinski's book dismisses the Constitution... for the same reasons that all other political documents have dismissed freedom, i.e. because it is "inadequate." However, Brzezinski's rejection of the Constitution is on unique grounds—"the age cannot bear the problems of assimilating the old into the new"—yet many of the problems are created by the self-same Trilateral members who now propose solutions.

According to Brzezinski mankind has moved through three states of evolution and we are now in the middle of the fourth and final state. In some ways the secular Brzezinski analysis is parallel to Jose Arguelles' The Mayan Factor, a mystical calendar of the world divided into periods. According to The Mayan Factor, our world is also presently in the final stages of dissolution, culminating in 2012 when it passes to higher levels of consciousness.

Back to Brzezinski, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission. The first global stage is described as "religious" and combines "a heavenly universalism provided by acceptance of the idea that man's destiny is essentially in God's hands" with an "earthly narrowness derived from massive ignorance, illiteracy and a vision confined to the immediate environment."
The second stage is nationalism, and defined as "another giant step in the progressive redefinition of man's nature and place in our world." In Arguelles this is paralleled as "materialism."

The materialist philosophy of Marxism comprises the third stage. For Brzezinski "this represents a further vital and creative stage in the measuring of man's universal vision." Neither David Rockefeller nor Zbignieuw Brzezinski cite the technological and moral weaknesses and excesses of Marxism. They view it as "creative" and a significant factor in man's maturity.

In reality, — and history has now demonstrated what some of us argued for years — Marxism is a hollow sham, a gigantic con job, a device for New York capitalists to control a country through technology and debt while pretending the opposite.
It was American trade unions, especially under Samuel Gompers and George Meany, that recognized the phoniness of Marxism. Wall Street and many academics who should have known better were the promoters, allies and apologizers for Marxism. Capitalists, because a monopoly state offers the opportunity of monopoly markets and monopoly profits without any uncomfortable criticism from the street. Academics, because Wall Street-financed Universities offer opportunities for self-advancement and self-aggrandisement.

After Marxism, according to Brzezinski, comes the fourth and final stage, the Technetronic Era or the idea of rational humanism on a global scale, the result of American-Communist cooperation.

Here is the Brzezinski view of the contemporary structure which is a tortured framework to present a supposed requirement for a New World Order political structure:

Tension is unavoidable as man strives to assimilate the new into the framework of the old. For a time the established framework resiliently integrates the new by adapting it in a more familiar shape. But at some point the old framework becomes overloaded The new input can no longer be redefined into traditional forms, and eventually it asserts itself with compelling force. Today, though, the old framework of international politics — with their spheres of influence, military alliances between nation-states, the fiction of sovereignty, doctrinal conflicts arising from nineteenth century crises — is clearly no longer compatible with reality.

Interestingly the Brzezinski estimate of change is significantly in error and this error will undoubtedly affect the nature of the world to come. New World Order is not inevitable.

Firstly, the current trend is towards small political units reflecting ethnic and national groups. Within the United States we have proposals for independent States and to divide States into two or three segments as large units become ungovernable and "overloaded." The framework is "overloaded" but the reaction is smaller units, not larger, ungovernable units. This is precisely the opposite reaction proposed by the Trilateral Commission.

Secondly, when it comes to "rational humanism" Brzezinski is again way off contemporary evolvement. Religion is coming back and in a more spiritual form. The older churches, institutionalized churches, are suffering losses, particularly the 2000-year-old Catholic church. However, there is a revival of religion through modern technology, i.e. radio churches and TV evangelists. Further there is a spiritual evolvement of extraordinary proportions in non-traditional forms such as meditation and communal groups. Some of these groups, such as the Church Universal and Triumphant in Montana, are now established and accepted by traditional areas.

This is a far cry from "humanism" and non-religion! However, it is in technology that we find departures from the "new world" proposed by Brzezinski and adopted by David Rockefeller and the Trilateral Commission. The technology of the future has an emerging spiritual component. The physics of the future, post-high energy physics and the vacuum energy physics of the 21st century is also a spiritual technology. The Eastern concepts of Buddhism and the material world are to an extent merging with the vacuum physics of the West, Zen and western physics are merging in a manner that confounds the ideas of the Trilateral Commission. Agreed that this new input cannot be defined in traditional terms, in this limited manner Brzezinski is correct but the new framework is not a rigid New World Order. Paradoxically. New World Order turns out to be a reflection of the old traditional framework! Brzezinski and Rockefeller propose to replace the old framework with a new framework. . but one under their control.

Kitap: Trilaterals over America (1995)
Yazar: Antony C Sutton
Kullanıcı avatarı
Genelkurmay Başkanı
Genelkurmay Başkanı
Mesajlar: 13983
Kayıt: 29 Eki 2010, 17:26

Dön İngiltere ve Amerika Birliği Faaliyetleri: 2. Dünya Savaşı ve Türk Soyumuzun Baş Düşmanı olan Cermen Menfaat Merkezi'nin Kuruluşu

Kimler çevrimiçi

Bu forumu gezen kullanıcılar: Hiç bir kayıtlı kullanıcı yok ve 1 misafir